The Transformation of the Roman Empire Into Byzantium
The transformation of the Roman Empire into what modern historians call Byzantium was not a single event but a gradual process, reaching a profound turning point in the 7th century.
By this time, the Roman state had changed in territory, culture, language, religion, and political structure, becoming something new—yet it continued to call itself Roman. The 7th century marked the moment when the Ancient Roman world evolved into the medieval Byzantine Empire, which had previously been known as the Eastern Roman Empire.
Although Hellenistic culture had long prevailed, cemented by the founding of Constantinople in 330, the Eastern Roman Empire retained the core elements of imperial Rome. Its administration remained rooted in Roman institutions, its cities preserved Classical urban culture, and its emperors regarded themselves as heirs of Augustus and Constantine. Latin was in decline, however, even as it remained the official language and the emperors claimed dominion over the entire Mediterranean.
The transformation was inevitable: Constantinople was emerging as the center of the empire while Rome’s influence waned. As historian Peter Brown observed, Byzantium represents continuity: “The Roman Empire did not fall in the East. It was transformed.” Centered in Constantinople, the Eastern Roman Empire remained a powerful and sophisticated Roman state but with a distinct Byzantine character—while still seeing itself as Roman.
An empire that adapted to the times
This transformation accelerated in the 7th century, driven by internal adaptations and catastrophic wars. The first major shock came from the Sassanian Persian Empire, which waged a long and brutal war against the Romans from 602 to 628. During this conflict, the Persians captured Syria, Egypt, and even Jerusalem. Although Emperor Heraclius eventually defeated them, both empires were left exhausted.
Almost immediately, a new and formidable enemy arose in the Middle East: Arab armies inspired by Islam, determined to seize territories held by the Roman Empire. Within just three decades, the Eastern Roman Empire lost Syria, Palestine, Egypt, and much of North Africa—its wealthiest provinces. Historian John Haldon notes, “The Arab conquests mark the real end of the Ancient Roman world and the beginning of Byzantium as a distinctly medieval state.”
After these long wars and the loss of vital territories, the empire contracted significantly. Even more consequential was the collapse of the old Roman Mediterranean economy. The Byzantines now had to reorganize their economy around Anatolia and the Aegean, signaling a major geographical and strategic shift in the empire.
The shift to an Anatolian, militarized state
Before the 7th century, the Roman Empire relied on a well-organized Mediterranean system: cities, trade routes, and political power functioned efficiently around the sea. After the Arab conquests, however, the empire transformed into a more compact, land-based state centered on Asia Minor.
Historian Avelil Cameron observes, “The 7th century witnessed the collapse of the old Roman order and the emergence of a new political and cultural configuration we call Byzantium.” Once-thriving cities declined in size, wealth, and influence. The loss of the rich eastern provinces deprived the empire of up to three-quarters of its revenue, and long-distance trade diminished significantly. The old civic elites disappeared, replaced by a more militarized and rural society shaped by the pressures of surrounding enemies.
A crucial aspect of the Roman-to-Byzantine transformation was the change in land ownership and agricultural organization. In the late Roman world, large estates (latifundia) dominated the countryside, controlled by urban elites and worked by dependent peasants. Taxes were collected in cash, and land formed part of a monetized imperial economy. This system collapsed under the strains of war, invasion, and fiscal breakdown, giving rise to a new socio-economic order rooted in defense and rural life.
Land ownership regulation and the theme system
The empire’s main tax‑producing regions had been Egypt and Syria. When Byzantium lost these provinces to Arab invasions, the state could no longer rely on the substantial cash revenues they provided.
In response, the government shifted toward a land‑based, subsistence economy in which land ownership was directly tied to military service. Soldiers were no longer paid primarily in money; instead, they were settled on land and sustained themselves as farmer‑soldiers. This arrangement was unique for its time—both practical and forward‑looking. As historian Mark Whittow explained, “The transformation of the fiscal system in the 7th century linked landholding directly to military obligation and changed the social structure of the empire.”
The most significant change was the creation of the themes: military‑administrative provinces where farmer‑soldiers defended their own regions. This system replaced the old Roman professional army, which the empire could no longer afford. Historian Warren Treadgold observes, “The themes were the institutional foundation of the medieval Byzantine state.” This reform marked a decisive shift from Classical Roman administration to a distinctly Byzantine model. The empire became smaller but more resilient, structured for survival rather than expansive conquest.
The theme system and the notion of property
In the theme system, land was redistributed or newly regulated so that soldiers held plots (stratiotika ktemata) in exchange for hereditary military service. This was not Roman landownership in the classical sense—it represented a new Byzantine model in which land became the foundation of both defense and social stability. As Leslie Brubaker and John Haldon note, “The connection between land, taxation, and military service was the backbone of the Byzantine state after the 7th century.”
The old Roman elite landowners declined in importance, replaced by a new rural military class loyal to the emperor. The state became more centralized in authority but more localized in daily life. Instead of governing through distant bureaucrats and urban tax systems, the empire now relied on loyal landholding soldiers embedded in the countryside.
This shift also transformed the very concept of property. Land was no longer simply private wealth; it became a resource of the state. Ownership carried obligations—to serve, defend, and sustain the empire. In this way, the Byzantine state was no longer just Roman—it had become a medieval military society shaped by the transformation of both landholding and social structure.
Greek language replaces Latin
Language played a key role in the transformation of the Roman Empire into Byzantium. Latin, long the language of administration and law, gradually gave way to Greek in the 7th century. Many inhabitants of the empire’s eastern provinces could not understand Latin, and Emperor Heraclius (r. 610–641) officially established Greek as the administrative language in the East.
Alongside language, cultural identity shifted as well. Historian Anthony Kaldellis observed, “By the 7th century, the empire was Roman in name but Greek in language and culture.” Byzantium adopted Koine Greek for spoken communication and formal written styles, making it the cultural, religious, and governmental language of the predominantly Greek-speaking population.
Despite the widespread use of Greek, Byzantines continued to call themselves Romans. They maintained their Roman identity, even as they expressed it through the Greek language and culture.
The importance of Christianity
While Constantine the Great legalized Christianity with the Edict of Milan in 313, ending the persecution of Christians, it was Emperor Theodosius who made it the official religion of the Roman Empire at the Council of Constantinople in 380. From that point on, Christianity and imperial authority became inseparable. Historian Steven Runciman famously wrote, “The Byzantine Empire was the Roman Empire baptized.”
Byzantine emperors continued to consider themselves Roman emperors in direct succession from Augustus. Yet, by the 7th century, Christianity had become central to Byzantine identity. The emperor was not seen by his subjects as merely a political ruler but as God’s representative on earth, appointed by divine authority to govern a Christian people as a sacred monarch with both religious and political power.
What reinforced Christianity’s role during this time of transformation was the loss of the empire’s eastern provinces, many of which were religiously divided. This contraction made the remaining empire more unified under Orthodox Christianity. As a result, Orthodoxy became a defining marker of Roman identity in the 7th century and beyond. Historian Chris Wickham notes, “The 7th century was the most decisive period of change in the history of the Roman State.”
This shift also influenced Byzantium’s legal and administrative structures. In late antiquity, Roman law and bureaucracy were vast and complex. By the 7th century, the empire streamlined its legal and administrative systems, and Classical Roman legal culture gave way to a more practical, Christian-oriented approach. While the empire still perceived of itself as Roman, its institutions now served a smaller, more defensive, and intensely Christian society. Historian Judith Herrin observes, “Byzantium was not Rome in decline, but Rome reimagined.”
Weakening of Classical education and culture
As Christianity came to dominate public life in Byzantium, traditional Roman Classical education and urban culture gradually declined. Theaters, baths, and civic rituals faded, and in their place arose monasticism, religious art, and a focus on sacred spaces. Averil Cameron observed, “Byzantium was not anti-classical, but it reoriented Classical heritage toward Christian purposes.”
Classical learning and the legacy of the Greeks and Romans survived the transition, but it was increasingly filtered through theology and religious devotion. The empire became a guardian of Greek knowledge, preserving it for future generations, yet it no longer lived fully in the Classical world.
Business Wire
No comments